Skip to content

By role

UI review for your role

The same UI review practice, framed for the person who owns the incident, the intent, the merge, or the team.

A closer look

Source correctness is not product correctness. The gap looks different from each seat.

Leadership

Design and QA

Engineering

01

At a glance

Diffraction is private MVP / design-partner ready UI review (product experience review) for UI-affecting GitHub PRs on web apps. Findings are aberrations: verified product experience failures with evidence. Tagline: See the full spectrum of every diff.

Thesis: source correctness ≠ product correctness. The same practice, four seats. Start with the category: What is UI review?. Contrast: UI review vs visual testing. Terms: glossary.

02

Four seats. One practice.

  • For executives: Brand, conversion, and governance risk on UI-affecting GitHub PRs.
  • For designers and QA: Verify the shipped UI matches intent, with evidence you can replay.
  • For engineers: See what the running PR head actually does before you merge.
  • For engineering leads: Confidence and efficiency at the PR boundary, without manual QA on every change.
03

Where Diffraction fits

If you want early design-partner access to a private MVP, email hello@diffraction.sh.

See the full spectrum of every diff.

See it in context

From a diff.
To a clearer picture.

Explore a checkout review in the actual Diffraction viewer.

Explore the example